为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。# w8 z$ X/ r2 V! E( \* k# M
/ A( E+ J4 o7 }5 _" S
; s, V+ R0 A- _* B- HGroups of Agents with a Leader
0 ~& ^! y. X! l2 r Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。- p1 c% m9 [% S2 R; ?( I# x6 s. D
$ e& \' N' {' I1 t* F' M只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
$ K) v, ^, K; p6 L: U
5 Z$ j+ C+ I' U- h
; V0 l+ u7 ^7 \% I0 _3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
0 P8 [! K. P: d0 b3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |