为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。 s3 A- A. r2 q8 x5 F5 q% k" N2 ]5 L! Z
m! k3 j5 B6 { O+ f. s% M7 P# U) v
( N1 w& m$ E, S1 ^ A# T# B4 D( W6 }3 h
Groups of Agents with a Leader
/ ^- L4 u4 e5 s* u5 w Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。" k/ q e4 D" V$ R- r5 \( x
+ x4 ~4 }& [! L
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!- s$ {4 S7 Z' K% ]
" I! N8 r6 Z `
$ M" S) t1 p3 |4 `% @5 |6 [- J# ~1 a3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
5 s/ T- }0 | s* h- @' \; T4 K! J3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |