为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
2 D6 p% `6 X, @# y4 z; l1 J1 \% k- y+ w+ S7 E
; \5 _ c- |6 Q' L) t. g
Groups of Agents with a Leader
! K6 A' Y. }( v6 ?/ _" V Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。$ Z4 e2 A W1 M
: X; p: \: b5 v3 w7 Q只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
( _* `; l z7 p/ [- _4 g
2 Z, K0 ]. k3 Z3 D' B8 T
" w$ H v* {1 F: W% L3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
. c0 p9 [ Y# \! D( ]+ H' {9 _3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |