|
Deborah A. Sadowski ,Mark R. Grabau
# e, {/ w, T6 g! X; e- MThere's a common misconception that performing a simulation study involves a sequence of steps (e.g., project definition, model formulation, verification, validation, analysis). To the contrary, all elements of a simulation project should be performed repeatedly throughout the effort, & Z4 J: ?/ }. b4 R) N
growing in scope as the model progresses.
. d5 c& E; y8 M) L2 H' Y- A# P* a, MIn the traditional view, projects suffer from too strong a focus on the model (and perhaps the animation), so that after the inevitable delays and problems, there's no time left to run scenarios. Instead, the analyst is faced with a presentation deadline that's firm and little time to experi-% H9 W0 x( Y5 I7 @- n
ment, analyze, or think.
) i( f: W+ k0 vInstead, you should schedule the project in complete phases. Intermediate milestones, spaced no more than about two weeks apart in a medium to large project, should include specific goals for the model, animation, data, and analysis. By the time you reach the last 25% of your time on the project, you should have addressed the basic analysis issues of run length, warm-up time, etc. and should already have performed preliminary analysis on the model for a number of different scenarios. |
|