为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
) K. u F, A# |5 z9 w2 ~: R: q! F6 H5 n( r" u6 [9 [( ~: G* H
Q+ r* q9 K! @% Z5 WGroups of Agents with a Leader 3 ^) ~' q8 ]: t2 e
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。% ~9 k: n% k; }# }9 ~3 h
+ c/ P7 K2 ?, q+ y
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!9 V, e7 A3 m& d8 O& Z/ n* U O1 j5 J) _. w
6 t1 e4 v! H9 M) k- J
1 _ ]: q2 I9 Z/ u/ Q: c; Z
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
; _/ {8 u9 f2 v' P: |" Z3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |