为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
& I+ N1 u/ _ `1 x% q9 V: }% s; J6 v/ x# f0 m3 Y! s) r( @
+ b: P, Z8 \7 o K$ U
Groups of Agents with a Leader
8 a0 f3 C+ \- g8 z/ ^: b* P, X Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。/ f5 d* Q& w* ?+ ~$ F8 _, h4 H7 K- @8 r
) W4 V7 O: Q3 N [+ r只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!6 N: t% k% D, c, w
* a# I: \; }5 M% c( R+ G% R3 u
. _; l c% O5 @+ [& ]3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | . l+ k: F$ D- T9 ?$ b( G9 G
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |