为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。5 g6 R( n$ D: [ H m
0 a ]( N# j1 Z, b0 A
1 P y; d& T0 h' s3 `" G, dGroups of Agents with a Leader ( A% ]) ^' ?9 E4 e# ^6 O
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。2 D% } M" L% J: _! Y. H) |
& `* b4 c) \0 T/ l5 O l q
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
: r" M a6 ~- F3 ~! d! J" m" t6 D, |! S/ d' C/ y' w* R) X) L8 t
' X% U" y/ z Y9 P$ Q2 T
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 6 w% K/ P( r7 ~' b9 {) R' j6 \4 X
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |