为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
9 W3 Z3 V: H0 C" s ~
! T7 i8 R4 C( D# }5 w$ ~/ d! M# L" }, H; D) T. y1 t4 a
Groups of Agents with a Leader ) @0 S. [ X" x6 R! C4 r
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
$ p9 f7 B0 e9 z" f$ {
! ?4 r, z$ A2 K' p% d只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
9 ~! }; Q1 R. d( ~3 H
6 T/ ]& X% F* ^, I) i; g2 m/ p; u3 e/ F& S
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 1 R7 T9 v6 y5 q- d4 I/ D
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |