为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。( R4 K) U ~7 s; O |/ w7 }$ R
7 \; ~0 o% w: c0 u8 W8 A0 @0 K4 c( i5 O3 w
3 s* x) y `9 O# a7 d+ T9 [Groups of Agents with a Leader 7 K5 X W! k, W) l0 C' k- b& d& d, _
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。5 U7 o; y1 y4 r* O8 Y
v U3 w' A& n* l: A) p% }% N只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
6 y3 N: g1 [; H4 B* W# s
; I# ?# k. }) z" _/ k+ y
( j- L4 P( N" w- A5 y2 T+ |3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
+ Y! `$ u# O; R0 S$ l3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |