为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
. o3 h, ?5 q, L5 e1 W/ y6 d/ O
9 R0 I8 ?3 b6 b( H: N! c
- F' ^8 ~* v3 D+ B4 _% j3 G7 b0 xGroups of Agents with a Leader ! r1 K: [8 U- A: _; P4 l
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。# m) d* q/ X' m' H
4 Q* `/ Z6 Z( e l" |8 S+ l
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!9 q7 k1 P |+ [( T1 R
7 [7 Z0 q0 o: V% ]2 L: m
7 F2 j, \! L# R: O- k# w
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
' T/ Y% {* O" l+ E6 }" v3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |