为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
* R1 U/ p/ B& _, ]5 h
7 G* Z* V+ b% D3 l- }9 P# Y+ M: H6 H( D6 ?! A+ v" K+ d _
Groups of Agents with a Leader ! b, u, J6 n6 A$ n- r) I( b; B
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
/ \0 W2 H6 q9 l! _' p( p0 ]
: }" n. j# Q: z0 a只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
3 R' R' X# X4 V0 ?) ^4 h; r" a, g0 G& n) b, V' X
9 A* F$ I3 {7 h. w4 E3 f5 ^: p
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
$ z9 C1 ^/ p1 a, F6 V" L V3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |