为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。4 F8 Y+ a( _ A2 Y9 E4 d
7 V7 v- P8 v1 ?) [- Q; I
; L& G$ H$ i6 n& f! d) `
Groups of Agents with a Leader
+ O/ |8 C/ X4 ~- C& J Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
& {5 L% ~2 ? z; V( k& n9 u
+ |* R, B9 [1 c" i只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
2 Y. n+ ?# R: _# ?4 W& a$ @8 b3 j, `. R4 i* e* U# E1 G
2 ~) I% s# b: E& j3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
& y9 ]2 O. D% ]+ {6 K4 e G5 j3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |