为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
# v( O# I; D- t3 a% v! J7 @
. |1 f5 n! L, ?3 W. z* B8 T T: K1 N% {0 y9 l! v
Groups of Agents with a Leader
; f3 V# \4 V# ]5 } Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。6 \2 |# c W: |, }
/ E# r) {0 f; R# J
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
- n* }" a. r* a* D+ x7 B- ?* `7 }& N% m7 E$ b6 W
% v& p7 N* U6 A8 j, D- @* m- a
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
! G0 b9 s6 n0 }4 j3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |