为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
1 H! W! ?3 ~6 l5 h" Q ~: h( e6 |
! w: e) L; e& ^( V% n9 G3 u' U
+ S1 u. d( X5 M' e% a# SGroups of Agents with a Leader
+ q6 o3 \0 c- g$ T Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。( Q1 j" u, a4 d# `* a7 v# L
. l( A% ^* S" ?7 h" g" }# C ]只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!$ }2 W: s4 @2 x& V1 y
' W* }; @8 ~3 F, A( S$ C. e) c
2 t( ~) y9 w1 k6 v4 \2 [& n5 J) j6 ^3 n( C
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
9 H4 Q% K' G7 o) M2 b& v- y3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |