为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。" F$ s% I8 C" E8 w
. K2 @; [9 n' q) i( G5 G* q4 S
0 A. i5 a/ l% M" Y# |3 d4 ~- F
Groups of Agents with a Leader
/ V, A7 R; J/ u8 D( T Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。# L1 T. h# s" A' L- {+ |: A1 k
% J* S' n' i1 S2 ]& r, r' l
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!' L+ v- y9 }/ _ W& A
- z" b$ A- k. t. r: [2 D; Y
5 D- U4 s+ C$ V. x& O8 a4 H4 E3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | $ u" L) A) O. u8 E" p% D! n* M
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |