为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
) v. |4 P- U" h) S4 L* Q) o& y+ e
$ m7 u8 b: y1 O
4 o; |! a3 V5 TGroups of Agents with a Leader " B, y- b+ }! P3 Y
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。, [" C$ l5 E/ t
T8 \* Y+ a! {4 ~. z
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
A! g A% c- i2 k( s0 U& R; j2 ?+ o6 \* J$ T4 R# I0 d1 s- n8 f0 g
6 n5 Y+ Y# r' D$ }* X* G0 D3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
4 w: t7 S3 y% F3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |