为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。& b, `/ R* b) R% _
3 Y( L) q, R- a. l8 I
7 u: |# z( W% P, _; L# }- z4 O; AGroups of Agents with a Leader
& B$ W( j: O& X7 q Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。; p" i0 c4 |: I* d. c1 W& i
/ w. i0 X- o% @- F只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
& n3 h6 {6 F6 j$ R# r9 I3 }$ H5 i* t# s8 N
3 u( ?- I- ~1 {& J# V) h7 N3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | 4 t/ x: h6 Z9 Q$ d- |
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |