为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。' d& z- ` |0 ~
/ {2 n* J. w' y, g1 E6 l0 B: x
. B0 R. ]( J+ q# n% @# H& m( n
Groups of Agents with a Leader
3 V( _6 X2 c- ` Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。! Q+ }, `( q& h: ?9 K/ T
2 u- a' m4 ]8 ?5 d
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!7 Z" R. R9 q) h! z3 u# h) P
0 T1 d, i9 [* l0 u, p) K
, T( F' y% @2 d. y2 X
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
8 ]. o1 e7 q# O9 s6 s @ F9 k3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |