为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。' r) }- t8 M( L$ `' N
) L' ]' X4 r: n, k& |/ X
7 W1 y& \/ d+ S% E( G( }7 v
Groups of Agents with a Leader 5 i& k1 e! U3 Z2 @" W m) m
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。" Y h' z2 R9 _/ | k
$ @8 K& b& t7 M% r! A
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
& y5 x R! l% y+ Z
- H4 |7 R& ~6 U. B& z/ J9 U1 |5 ?. w( X: h
3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
9 P: ^( W0 K% W& l3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |