为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。! y+ k# `9 _2 V" e% k' m/ q5 j, e
. ^% r% {% w0 ]6 M4 I( h t" u9 |, Y: c# p4 h5 O6 R9 G( r
Groups of Agents with a Leader ! }8 `. @8 D1 b, X
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。, `+ l: W; v; q& n
4 T. h+ }$ m j$ x% y0 w L, m1 g只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!, F0 j3 ?/ V! ?# ?# |+ N
! C) i9 O" ]* k& p" w% M9 N8 |
0 ?0 Y5 ~+ w* |( l4 R3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | | , ]; y- e' d5 e! n* q% S
3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |