为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。) b) e! b1 X4 R3 f' \+ x
' S, q3 \- B i( Q
" L' G* x: |& bGroups of Agents with a Leader
& N' U5 \1 a4 N @; O% k Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。; v% a$ d& ^+ A. c' L( X2 o
2 [2 V1 {! f- a' e; H
只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!5 A7 H6 ^1 f% i" I3 s
+ P: O- J! H$ Q# |' [ ~
3 h8 `3 E; \' s# B0 R1 @3 N9 G3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | Group size | First | Last | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
: M( O: b: @- E0 C# L( U3 |/ ?3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |