为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。
& v6 c; ]3 [- [6 T7 E8 L
. v* I3 u1 |2 c) ?% _" \! r+ V0 {5 f. p2 f
Groups of Agents with a Leader - k# d& H" p+ \5 K# i* b; T3 k
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
6 j4 a/ b& G; e& P& e) C+ c
. X6 ?$ f+ l3 n只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!
2 s% L% A- }: H" |9 c' e/ Y/ Q8 O d4 P- c1 ^" ^" z
0 t/ P- O5 {# \$ S$ L3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
6 g0 _( {0 O; ~! k( P4 M$ i5 m% {3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |