为了促进学术交流,SimulWay将推出“基于Agent仿真前沿学术论文翻译系列”,同时方便大家获取仿真币途径。8 n* T3 J" G1 u4 H4 j9 z! y$ _1 {
" z% K J S( R8 e3 o+ `. R- Q8 v, y1 \: _, I9 r
Groups of Agents with a Leader
+ Z- X, y2 {3 Z4 L1 t5 w* X Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 10, no. 4 part21 共165字,请翻译。
+ M3 t( u4 l' R) A+ Z. Y
! K# Z) }! b$ i6 @- T只有通顺正确的翻译才可能赢得悬赏!) e2 ~; X( A% M1 a
" ~- {* c" g. L3 e
4 Y; n- J7 c" B* ?. N2 b3.16 The results of adding space-dependent communication to groups without a leader are shown in Table 7. | | Table 7: Time taken to reach the target by the first and the last individual in groups of 10 and 50 agents without a leader and space-dependent communication | | | Group size | First | Last | | 10 | 57 (103) | 720 (1184) | | 50 | 3 (5) | 56 (10) | |
* {2 I4 G2 S: b" S+ q2 q8 ?3.17 Predictably, space-dependent communication is less effective than space-independent communication. The effect varies as a function of group size. In groups of 50 individuals, there is only a small deterioration in performance compared to groups with space-independent communication. In groups of 10 individuals, however, space-limited communication results in much worse performance. The reason is that with space-dependent communication information takes longer to reach all the individuals in a group. Given an environment of a certain size, individuals in large groups tend to be closer to one another because of their greater density. As a result, the negative effects of space-dependent communication are limited. By contrast, small groups tend to be more dispersed and information takes longer to reach all the individuals in the group. |